From

Location

Message

Date Posted

Joliet, IL

has anyone had any luck or know any info about these 3
and which order would you plant them based on my prime
#1 patch area, #2 medium prime area, and #3 patch area that
receives the least amount of sunlight.

if anyone feels like sharing some info on these 3 feel
free to do so. good or bad, it doesn't matter.
thanks

12/8/2002 10:52:39 AM

Cornwall UK.(50N 5W)300ft.

The guy that grew Sweden's biggest used the 1007,I think it was October on the mallorn list there's a link to several photo's of it growing.It grew the 1059est Johnson as well.

12/8/2002 12:43:52 PM

Cornwall UK.(50N 5W)300ft.

Sorry,it didn't grow the 1059 but it was the pollinator of the 1083.5

12/8/2002 12:49:42 PM

Caceres, Spain

Like all of three are from 2000, I would look to their Progeny:
1048 Cox: 653, 740, 772.5, 797
1025 Bobier: 362, 822, 973
1007 Brown: 514, 705.5, 783, 820, 898
In my opinion, I will put them in this order 1025, 1007, 1048. Of course, you can look to the hierarchy tree in order to decide it and then put the 10048 before the 1007, but...
Just an opinion.
Don

12/8/2002 1:19:45 PM

Sydney, Australia

The 1048 Cox grew an 870 uow for John Powers (lobsta on this site)

12/8/2002 11:32:51 PM

Honesdale, Pennsylvania

I grew a 797 on the Cox 1048 in 2001. It was a trouble free plant for me and the fruit went 11 percent heavy. I would not hesitate to plant it again.

12/9/2002 7:24:51 AM

Herndon, VA

The 898 Knauss (1007 Brown x 1048 Cox) grew the 1156 Larson in 2002. Try doing the same cross, you could get lucky!

12/9/2002 9:26:21 PM

Joliet, IL

thanx all....this site is the best

12/11/2002 8:47:29 PM